eolab:ecotower:dendrometer_overview
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Last revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
eolab:ecotower:dendrometer_overview [2022/10/11 05:28] – jan001 | eolab:ecotower:dendrometer_overview [2022/10/11 05:31] – jan001 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
After 5 working days (not consecutive) we had a prototype ready. The first test was made at Eric Cosio' | After 5 working days (not consecutive) we had a prototype ready. The first test was made at Eric Cosio' | ||
- | < | + | < |
The prototype consists of a custom-made PCB and housing by Spelsberg which already had the cable gland preinstalled. | The prototype consists of a custom-made PCB and housing by Spelsberg which already had the cable gland preinstalled. | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Unfortunately, | Unfortunately, | ||
- | < | + | < |
As a reference: In photo 2 you can see the dendrometer logger that was used before. It was quite big and heavy and the main disadvantage is that the battery lasted only 2 to 3 months. Especially in remote locations, this is really hard to justify. The only advantage it currently has is that multiple dendrometers could be attached. But once the new LoRaWAN node proves itself in the field, a slightly bigger version could be developed which could accommodate multiple dendrometers if needed. | As a reference: In photo 2 you can see the dendrometer logger that was used before. It was quite big and heavy and the main disadvantage is that the battery lasted only 2 to 3 months. Especially in remote locations, this is really hard to justify. The only advantage it currently has is that multiple dendrometers could be attached. But once the new LoRaWAN node proves itself in the field, a slightly bigger version could be developed which could accommodate multiple dendrometers if needed. |
eolab/ecotower/dendrometer_overview.txt · Last modified: 2022/10/17 02:10 by jan001